What Fix does
Fix turns every finding from Detect into a remediation proposal: the specific configuration change, code change or process change that removes the root cause, not the symptom. It is written for the person who will apply it — your engineer, your DevOps, your CDN admin — in the order they should apply it.
Root cause, not symptom
A missing Strict-Transport-Security header is a symptom; the root cause may be a CDN rule that was overwritten by a deploy. An exposed .git folder is a symptom; the root cause is a build step that ships the repository. Fix names the cause and gives you the change at that level, so the same finding does not reopen at the next release.
What you receive
- A PDF report per run: findings ordered by severity, each with evidence, impact, and the step-by-step remediation.
- The same findings and fixes in the client area, with their status over time.
- Where it applies, ready snippets: the header block, the CSP directive, the server or edge rule, the dependency bump.
Propose-only, then verify
On your systems SWR7 proposes, it does not apply. The hand on your production is yours. Once your team applies the change, the swarm re-runs the same detection and closes the finding only when it is no longer observed — never on a promise. If it is still there, it stays open and says why.
Working with your team
Fix is written for engineers, not for auditors: no hundred-page appendix, no generic advice copied from a vendor knowledge base. When a remediation has trade-offs — a stricter CSP that may break a third-party script, a rate limit that may touch legitimate traffic — the report says so and gives you the safe order of operations.
Frequently asked questions
Can SWR7 apply the fixes for us?
No: SWR7 is propose-only by design, because the person accountable for production should be the one changing it. What you get is the exact change, in the order to apply it, and a re-test that confirms it worked.
What if we disagree with a finding?
Contest it: the finding is re-checked, and if it is a false positive it is closed with the reason recorded. Disagreement on severity is discussed with the evidence on the table.
Do we get code, or advice?
Where a fix is a concrete artifact — a header, a directive, a rule, a version — you get the artifact. Where it is a process change, you get the steps and the reason.